Intel Ark – the companycondemnedThe new controversial screen cards – Has been beaten in the latest Puget . system standardized tests (Opens in a new tab).
When trying out the new Intel Arc A750 8GB and Arc A770 16GB graphics cards, which were released on October 12, the custom PC builder discovered that performance was less than amazing compared to NVIDIA’s popularity. GeForce RTX 3060.
While Intel’s GPUs focus primarily on gaming, which means content creation is sometimes a secondary concern, the company admitted, “We’ve encountered a number of instances where we lose software support, or where a planned feature wasn’t working properly. Totally Correct.”
Create content (slowly)
Conduct a series of tests in Da Vinci Resolve – Our best pick for Best Free Video Editing Software The results showed that both Arc graphics cards struggled when facing the 12GB GeForce RTX 3060. Overall, NVIDIA’s demo was found to be 20-30% faster than either.
Going deeper, the company has turned its attention to GPU effects and RAW correction. Once again, GeForce outperformed the competition, with impact processing 10-20% faster and deposit removal nearly 50%.
When it comes to H.264 encoding and decoding, it was hardly a competition at all. The Intel GeForce RTX 3060 duo has been stripped, with nearly identical results upon decoding on the Nvidia GPU and Intel’s iGPU.
Compounding the problem, Puget Systems discovered that “when using an Intel Arc card in addition to the iGPU (with Resolve set to use ‘Intel Quick Sync’ for decoding), we experienced slightly lower performance than we did with either the iGPU or NVDEC with the RTX 3060. “
“Performance was lower if we only used an Arc card (with iGPU disabled),” she added.
However, there has been better news on the crypto front. When pairing the Arc A770 with the iGPU, the company found it to be 43% faster than the original encoder with Core i9 12900 K And 32% faster than using the Intel iGPU alone.
The Intel Arc A750, on the other hand, was less fast — but the results show some potential, the company claimed.
Standards have also been implemented Adobe Premiere ProAnd the Adobe After EffectsUnreal Engine, and higher 3D modeling and animation software mixer;
The results were more encouraging here. The A770 easily rivals (but couldn’t beat) the GeForce card in both Adobe’s premium video editor and vfx-programs. The A750 performed less well, but held its own – especially in Premiere Pro. But, as Puget Systems noted, the CPU is much more important in After Effects.
In Unreal Engine – which hints at Intel’s attempt to attract not only gamers but also game developers – it was found that “Considering performance in the Unreal Engine, the Arc A770 is about 8.5% faster than the NVIDIA RTX 3060, while the A750 is 7% slower.”
For graphic design artists, both Intel Arc GPUs deliver surprisingly poor performance – making NVIDIA the only game in town when it comes to professional rendering.
Despite concerns that high-end Arc GPUs provide a subpar experience for content creators, at least Puget Systems has found that video editing It took advantage of Intel’s Deep Link technology, which allows the Arc dGPU and Intel’s iGPU to work together.
